Last Gasp 3:42 Mon May 7
Drinkwater
|
|
With the midfield likely to be light of a couple of players next season. Would you try and steal Drinkwater away from Chelsea?
|
|
|
Replies - Newest Posts First ( Show In Chronological Order)
Sven Roeder
7:07 Mon May 7
Re: Drinkwater
|
Man U reserve player that had his moment of glory when Kante carried him around the pitch.
Knows he will never do that again and has managed to GARNER a ludicrous contract at Chelsea.
Cant imagine he will want to give that up or Chelsea will give him away.
Read they want £53m for Babayoko who has been utterly abysmal.
|
Takashi Miike
6:59 Mon May 7
Re: Drinkwater
|
he's had his best year/s, look elsewhere and for a lot cheaper
|
Vexed
6:37 Mon May 7
Re: Drinkwater
|
He's just a more fashionable version of Mark Noble.
30m is a joke. He is slow as Noble too.
No.
|
Texas Iron
6:36 Mon May 7
Re: Drinkwater
|
20million max...
|
Hammer I am
6:32 Mon May 7
Re: Drinkwater
|
I thought this was going to be the kidney stone support group
|
Bernie
6:26 Mon May 7
Re: Drinkwater
|
Decent player, streets ahead of Kouyate, Noble and Obiang in the FOOTBALLER stakes , but he's a bit old and would take up a large portion of our wedge
I suspect a LOAN
|
goose
4:31 Mon May 7
Re: Drinkwater
|
Not sure the quoted £30m is steeling
|
Alex V
4:25 Mon May 7
Re: Drinkwater
|
Too old. I also don't think Chelsea will want to sell - they have a huge problem with the home-grown quota already.
|
stepney hammer
4:12 Mon May 7
Re: Drinkwater
|
We've been linked to him for £30m, which seems a huge amount of money for an average to good PL midfielder. Personally I don't think he's a big enough improvement on Noble to justify that sort of fee. If were going to be breaking our transfer record to land someone for that role, then a massive improvement on what we already have is the least I would expect. Not just an extra body.
Any potential buyer will have to pay over the odds because Chelsea will want to recoup the money they wasted on him last summer. Also add the fact that he's English which always puts a premium to the price.
I think we should monitor Wilshere's contract situation before looking at anyone else for this postion given that he's likely to be available on a free. Jack is better and younger that Drinkwater.
|
El Scorchio
4:09 Mon May 7
Re: Drinkwater
|
Jesus no.
That would be a terrible idea and probably exactly what our board would try to do.
|
swindon hammer
3:58 Mon May 7
Re: Drinkwater
|
Would prefer Joe Allen and/or Tom Cairney.
|
dazz
3:56 Mon May 7
Re: Drinkwater
|
i think he's 29 .., how much is left in the tank ?
for the money we'd be better off with Hunger and youth ,
all depends on the money.
|
jfk
3:56 Mon May 7
Re: Drinkwater
|
I'm on the sangria in the garden playing cricket with the kids and thier pals.
Come inside to knock up another bucket full.
I'll worry about rehydrating tomorrow morning.
Make hay and all that
|
Spandex Sidney
3:49 Mon May 7
Re: Drinkwater
|
I like Drinkwater and he's a bit of a unit but Chelsea did pay £35m for him and he must be on unbelievable wedge
Plus why would any half decent player come and play for our cunts of owners?
|
4ever-blowin-bubbles
3:49 Mon May 7
Re: Drinkwater
|
could be worth a punt if we can get him cheap enough
|
Leonard Hatred
3:46 Mon May 7
Re: Drinkwater
|
Why would he take a huge drop in wages to come and play for this fucking circus?
|
gph
3:46 Mon May 7
Re: Drinkwater
|
Last Gasp suggesting Drink water?
|
| 
